Having that little bit of heel counter in there really locks my foot in well, for a narrow-ish type of heel, while giving my foot the ability to move around without feeling impeded by a hard counter on the back.įrom a tongue standpoint, it’s a thin piece of foam sandwiched between some mesh. That works well with this lacing system with overlays that are on here. Once it gets about halfway down, there is a structured heel counter. There’s even a little bit extra on the sides when you might be catching or scuffing something.įrom a heel standpoint, it is a good compromise of a heel counter where it is soft up top, so you don’t have any pushing against your Achilles tendon. This is hard, from the outsole wrapping around to the front. Just mesh that lets your toes do what they need to do.įrom a protection standpoint, there’s a decent amount here. There’s some room for your toes to move and really nothing getting in the way. And you can see it’s a little blunter-looking. For a Peregrine, there’s a fair amount of room for your toes to wiggle. It’s just enough on this upper to make this feeling of a lockdown fit that you can run fast in, without creating so much overlay that the shoe’s inflexible, that it’s heavy.Īnother thing I’ll comment on is the width of the toebox. That’s done along the lacing area to create some structure so that when you pull the laces together, it creates this cage, this wrap, from the heel all the way down to the toes. The only place where you’re going to see some of these overlays are on the upper part of the shoe. There are way less overlays compared to previous versions of the Peregrine. You can see it’s a very simple kind of mesh patterning. Moving to the upper of the Saucony Peregrine 12, it is again simplified. At the same time, this comes at the cost of some flexibility, feel for the trail, and breathability.A medial view of the Saucony Peregrine 12. The very strong uppers and midfoot materials showed no signs of wear-the ST is among the most durable shoes I’ve ever worn. I found Salomon’s SpeedCross better only for gripping wet rocks when climbing (due to the multi-directional tread pattern compared to Saucony’s singular direction). They’re a great tool to have in the shed for a specific job: getting in mileage no matter how bad the conditions are, but these are definitely not for racing. These shoes have amazing traction the tread is wonderful for muddy, messy trails. I was concerned because Salomons feel narrow and stiff on my feet, but the ST was far roomier, plusher, and more comfortable (though still a stiff shoe overall). “When I pulled the Peregrine 11 ST out of the box, I thought they were Salomon’s Speedcross from the quick-lace pocket. | Peregrine 11 ST Tester Arch: Medium | Gait: Neutral | Footstrike: Midfoot It will be very beneficial on hot days, though a little brisk in the winter-but that’s why they make wool socks.” The upper provided a comfortable fit, with ample room for my toes due to the material’s flexibility, and I found it very breathable. While the Peregrine was adequate on softer surfaces-especially great on grassy cross-country courses-I wanted more cushioning on harder-packed trails. However, I definitely prefer Hoka’s cushioning as I’ve been running for decades and have a lot of miles on my legs. The traction is comparable to my La Sportiva Kaptiva GTX and much better than my Hoka. The aggressive lugs gave me confidence on all surfaces and bit into terrain ranging from snow-covered trails and grass to mud and dirt. “Traction, traction, and traction.that is the highlight of the Peregrine 11. | Peregrine 11 Tester Arch: Medium | Gait: Neutral | Footstrike: Midfoot Lakota Gambill What Our Wear Testers Said However, testers found the all-black, waterproof membrane runs hot. The Peregrine 11 also comes in a GoreTex version (right). “It feels supportive, firm, and purposeful with the right balance of performance and cushion that lasts.” “The midsole focuses less on cushioning and more on substance-it’s springy and gives you a great ride, but it’s not super plush,” one tester said. Still, the standard Pwrrun has a noticeably firmer ride than its “plus” sibling. Recently, Saucony fiddled with the mix of TPU and EVA polymers in the Pwrrun ratio, so the foam does feel more similar to the more responsive Pwrrun+ iteration than before. The material is a significant upgrade from the brand’s previous Everun foam, but it’s not quite as bouncy as the newest Pwrrun PB found on the Endorphin series and the Freedom 4. In terms of midsole cushioning, all the Peregrines use the same stuff: Saucony’s Pwrrun. Lakota Gambill The Standard Peregrine 11 Model.Is Anything But Standard Testers found the quick-lacing maintained a snug midfoot fit that didn’t loosen over the miles-crucial for those who had previously lost shoes in deep mud.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |